My partner for the peer reviewing was Elliot and we chose to review each other’s drafts through google docs and comment on each others draft. Elliot helped a lot because I’m not very good with grammar at all and he didn’t let anything slide which was really beneficial to me because I have been trying to catch up on the grammar side of things on paper for years now and this is going to help me a lot not only that he gave me good guidance as to what to do with my paper in order to make it stronger for example he told me that I should try to broaden the scope of my paper by asking around and using different historical examples to define comfort zone in a different light and through this new definition I would be able to broaden the scope of my paper. I agree with his advice because what I’m struggling with in my paper is subject matter and getting too repetitive and I think broadening the scope of my autoethnography will be really helpful because it will give me something new to go off of and through that I can make the paper all the more interesting. I think that before I submit my final draft I need to introduce the benefits of being in your comfort zone, I need to fix my grammar drastically, I need to broaden the scope of my topic in order to keep things interesting and non repetitious.

This entry is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.